Umno mesti bersungguh-sungguh untuk berubah

July 28, 2009

by Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh

Amalkan proses pemilihan berintegriti bebas daripada sebarang bentuk sogokan atau penyalahgunaan kuasa

KETIKA menyampaikan ucapan penerimaan jawatan Presiden pada hari terakhir Perhimpunan Agung Umno pada 28 Mac lalu, Datuk Seri Najib Razak memberi bayangan bahawa Umno akan berubah bagi memastikan kelangsungan berterusan parti itu pada masa depan.

Presiden Umno itu yakin bahawa secara umumnya, rakyat tidak menolak Umno, tetapi ’sebenarnya mereka mahu Umno berubah.’ Antara faktor perubahan struktur di dalam Umno yang mahu dilihat oleh rakyat ialah proses pemilihan berintegriti yang bebas daripada sebarang bentuk sogokan atau penyalahgunaan kuasa.

Untuk tujuan itu Majlis Tertinggi (MT) Umno menubuhkan Jawatankuasa Induk Pindaan Perlembagaan Umno yang dipengerusikan oleh Naib Presiden, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein, yang sudah mengadakan mesyuarat pertamanya baru-baru ini.

Berasaskan kepada prinsip ‘proses pemilihan yang berintegriti’ itu, perubahan yang dicadangkan oleh Najib ialah pertama, membabitkan lebih ramai perwakilan dalam proses pemilihan. Kedua, pindaan itu akan menjurus kepada memberi ruang lebih liberal kepada mereka yang ingin menawarkan diri untuk berkhidmat kepada parti tanpa ada sekatan di dalam bentuk kuota.

Dari perspektif sejarah piagam atau perlembagaan Umno yang asal, ia dirangka oleh satu jawatankuasa yang dipilih dalam Kongres Melayu Pertama di Kelab Sultan Sulaiman pada 1 Mac 1946. Ahli jawatankuasa yang dipilih ialah Datuk Onn Ja’afar sebagai pengerusi dengan yang lainnya terdiri daripada Datuk Panglima Bukit Gantang, Datuk Nik Ahmad Kamil, Datuk Hamzah Abdullah dan Zainal Abidin Ahmad atau Za’aba.

Rangka deraf perlembagaan itu diluluskan sebulat suara dengan beberapa pindaan oleh perwakilan Kongres Melayu Ketiga di Istana Besar, Johor Bahru pada 11 Mei 1946, selepas ia dibentang dan dibahas dengan panjang lebar.

Sejak itu, tidak banyak perubahan dibuat kepada perlembagaan Umno, kecuali selepas ia diisytiharkan tidak sah oleh mahkamah pada 1988 dengan diperkenalkan undi bonus dan kemudian sistem kuota untuk bertanding jawatan penting dalam parti, sama ada pada peringkat tertinggi atau bahagian.

Pada 1978, bekas Ketua Penerangan Umno, Sulaiman Palestin hanya memerlukan dua pencalonan untuk melayakkannya bertanding jawatan Presiden melawan Tun Hussein Onn. Beliau tewas walaupun mampu mendapat 250 undi, berbanding Hussein yang memperoleh 898 undi.

Pada 1987 menyaksikan pertandingan paling akhir untuk jawatan Presiden dan Timbalan Presiden Umno sebelum pindaan dibuat yang memperkenalkan sistem bonus 10 undi kepada setiap pencalonan yang diterima.

Kerana sistem bonus inilah menyebabkan Tun Abdul Ghafar Baba menarik diri daripada bertanding mempertahankan jawatan Timbalan Presiden pada 1993 apabila beliau dicabar Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Pendekatan ‘undi bonus’ ini dilihat sebagai tidak popular dan mungkin juga tidak berkesan. Perlembagaan Umno dipinda lagi, kali ini memperlihatkan sesiapa yang hendak menawarkan diri bertanding jawatan Presiden parti hendaklah mendapat sekurang-kurangnya 30 peratus pencalonan daripada jumlah bahagian di dalam parti.

Pada peringkat bahagian pula, calon yang hendak bertanding sebagai ketua perlu mendapat 20 peratus jumlah cawangan yang sah di dalam bahagian itu. Ada dua kritikan terhadap sistem pemilihan yang ada di dalam Umno sekarang.

Pertama, sistem kuota itu dilihat sebagai menyekat parti daripada memilih pemimpin yang terbaik. Seorang anak muda yang ingin berbakti di dalam parti melihat sukar untuk dia mendapat tempat kerana bukan senang untuk dinamakan oleh jumlah cawangan yang boleh melayakkan dia bertanding di dalam bahagian. Umno tidak dilihat sebagai parti yang ‘mesra kepada ahli baru’.

Kedua, rakyat secara umumnya sukar untuk menerima bahawa hanya lebih kurang 2,600 perwakilan yang menentukan siapa menjadi seorang Presiden Umno dan kemudian secara hukum adatnya, seorang Perdana Menteri.

Hakikatnya, sukar untuk menolak hujah kenapa sistem yang ada mengizinkan 2,600 orang perwakilan memilih seorang Perdana Menteri yang mewakili 28 juta penduduk negara. Oleh itu tidak menghairankan bahawa Presiden Umno di dalam ucapan penerimaan jawatannya membayangkan bahawa pindaan perlembagaan nanti akan membuka ruang lebih besar kepada akar umbi untuk memilih pemimpin tertinggi parti.

Bahkan Najib, di dalam ucapan yang sama dengan tegas mengatakan bahawa ’saya tidak mahu berselindung di sebalik kuota untuk menjadi Presiden Umno’.

Ada cadangan setakat ini yang membayangkan untuk memberi kuasa memilih jawatan tertinggi parti kepada semua perwakilan dari cawangan ke mesyuarat perwakilan bahagian. Atas andaian hitung panjang 500 perwakilan di dalam satu-satu mesyuarat perwakilan bahagian, maka kuasa memilih kepada 191 bahagian Umno seluruh negara akan membabitkan jumlah yang mencecah 95,500 perwakilan.

Dalam proses transformasi parti, jika diluluskan nanti, pindaan ini akan memberikan satu ‘empowerment’ (kuasa) kepada perwakilan cawangan, kerana mereka boleh memilih pemimpin tertinggi parti termasuk ahli MT secara langsung.

Walaupun ini masih pada peringkat cadangan, ia adalah strategi serampang dua mata. Pertama ia mengotakan kata dan janji Presiden untuk membuat satu perubahan dan transformasi parti dengan membabitkan lebih ramai ahli akar umbi memilih pemimpin. Kedua, ia mengecilkan bahkan menutup terus ruang untuk amalan politik wang yang terlalu sinonim dengan pemilihan di dalam parti.

Suka atau tidak suka, Umno menghadapi masalah persepsi yang negatif. Selagi rakyat tidak dapat melihat satu usaha bersungguh-sungguh untuk mengubah persepsi ini, sukar untuk Umno memenangi kembali hati dan jiwa rakyat. Umno perlu berubah dan perlu dilihat bersungguh-sungguh untuk berubah.

Langkah untuk meminda perlembagaan parti adalah satu langkah berani dan drastik yang memberi kredibiliti kepada janji Presiden parti untuk melihatkan ’satu proses pemilihan yang berintegriti’. Sebagai parti yang sudah lama ditubuhkan dan lebih penting lama memerintah, Umno mudah untuk terdorong kepada satu zon yang selesa. Tidak mudah untuk mendapatkan kembali kredibiliti parti yang terhakis selepas Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-12.

Mesyuarat perwakilan Umno bahagian yang bermula pada 16 Julai hingga 16 Ogos ini sudah diminta mengemukakan cadangan pindaan perlembagaan Umno bagi mencapai objektif ini. Segala usul pada peringkat bahagian akan dibincangkan dalam Jawatankuasa Induk Pindaan Perlembagaan untuk diangkatkan kepada Majlis Tertinggi sebelum dibentang dalam Perhimpunan Agung Khas Umno pada Oktober ini.

Akar umbi Umno mempunyai peluang ini untuk meniupkan roh baru di dalam Umno dan ia peluang untuk mengubah persepsi negatif terhadap Umno. Gunakanlah peluang ini demi untuk memenangi hati rakyat pada Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 nanti.

Bak kata Presiden parti, “Sayalah di antara pemimpin pertama yang mengungkapkan perkataan berubah sebelum diubah dan berubah sebelum kita rebah.”

Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh ialah Setiausaha Jawatankuasa Induk Pindaan Perlembagaan Umno.


Tevez signs for Manchester City

July 19, 2009

by AFP

Manchester City on Monday said they had signed Argentine striker Carlos Tevez, who left Manchester United at the end of the season, amid reports they also want Arsenal’s Emmanuel Adebayor.

Manchester City on Monday said they had signed Argentine striker Carlos Tevez, who left Manchester United at the end of the season, amid reports they also want Arsenal’s Emmanuel Adebayor.

Tevez, 25, has agreed terms with City and is set to sign a five-year deal, his new club said following weeks of rumours regarding his future.

No fee was mentioned but City were expected to have to shell out in the region of 25 million pounds (35 million euros) for the player they have coveted all summer.

“It is terrific news,” said City manager Mark Hughes.

“Carlos is an international player of the highest class who possesses all the attributes that will help drive this club forward,” Hughes told the club’s official website.

“He is not only outstanding technically but he is a reliable goal scorer and someone who will contribute fully to the team ethic. He gives us another exciting, attacking dimension.”

Last week City said they were giving up on plans to sign Barcelona star Samuel Etoo, but having secured Tevez’s services they are now also hoping to net Togolese forward Adebayor, even though he signed a new Arsenal contract at the Emirates Stadium, media reports indicated late Tuesday.

City said in a statement on Tevez: “Personal terms with the 25-year-old have been concluded and the deal has been ratified by the Premier League and the Football Association.”

City added that Tevez, who will wear the number 32 shirt next season, will have the mandatory medical check and then link up with the squad on their pre-season tour of South Africa.

Tevez spent two years with United, scoring 34 goals in 99 apearances after joining from West Ham, winning two English Premiership titles and the 2008 Champions League crown.

He started out with Boca Juniors before joining Brazilian side Corinthians in 2005.

Earlier Monday, United manager Sir Alex Ferguson he realised weeks ago that Tevez would not stay at Old Trafford, despite his cult status with fans.

“I half expected Carlos Tevez would be going a long time back. I think he maybe did a deal around January because I spoke to him and gave him an offer on the night we played Inter Milan and he never came back to me,” Ferguson told reporters.

“I phoned him on holiday and he never got back to me and I texted him twice and he never got back to me then either, so obviously he had made his mind up a long time ago,

“He was a good player and did well for us. But he obviously assessed the situation and wanted to go somewhere else.”


Man City pledge to keep spending

July 19, 2009

Manchester City executive chairman Garry Cook insists the club will keep spending until manager Mark Hughes is happy with his squad.City have spent £55m in signing Gareth Barry, Roque Santa Cruz and Carlos Tevez and want England captain John Terry and Everton’s Joleon Lescott.

Cook said: “It stops when Mark Hughes feels that he’s got the right quality of players in the squad.

“We’re limited by virtue of a window of opportunity to buy those players.”

Cook, speaking at the start of a three-match tour of South Africa, added that he hoped City would become “the darling of world football”.

Cook also defended City against criticism of their spending, with owners the Abu Dhabi United group splashing out £150m since buying the club 12 months ago.

He said: “I think the players that we’ve acquired will add strength to the squad and that’s the ambition.
“This isn’t really about spending. I’d like to just make sure the message is clear that we’re investing in the future of the football club.

“The investments that we’re making currently will define the football club for the next 10 years. I think when you do that to compete with the top four in the Premier League, you have to invest to reach those new levels.

“The players that we’re looking to invest further in, they’re well documented. But I think it would be a little unfair of us to discuss players who aren’t with us at this moment in a public forum.

“But it’s fair to say that we’re continuing our discussions with Emmanuel Adebayor and who knows.”

Cook added: “I think Man City has a strong heritage in the world of football, particularly in England. We’ve become the focus of attention, most definitely in the past 12 months.

“The quality of players that we’re bringing to the club is showing the intent of our owners and our ambition continues to reach new heights. When you start to do that, that attention starts to develop a fan base around the world.

“What this event in South Africa does for us is enable us to reach out to those fans and reach out to those new communities.

“Everybody likes to have fans around the world and not just in Manchester, so we hope we will become the darling of world football.”

And £12m new boy Barry also hit back at suggestions from Liverpool boss Rafael Benitez – whose long pursuit of the former Aston Villa captain ended in failure – that his move to Eastlands was motivated by money.

“I think there was maybe a bit of frustration (from Benitez) because it was well documented that Liverpool were in the market to sign me for a couple of years,” Barry stated.

“Manchester City had agreed a fee with Aston Villa. Once I’d spoken to the manager, heard the ambition and he told me what the club were aiming for, that suited me.

“People can talk about the money because of the speculation in the media but the players that are now joining are proving my decision to be a correct one. These are players that are really going to improve Manchester City and take us to where we want to go.”

PuTERAKL says “Revolusi.. Revolusi.. Revolusi.. Cayalah Garry Cook ;)


Google data center born without chillers

July 17, 2009

By Cade Metz in San Francisco

Posted in Servers, 16th July 2009 00:01 GMT

Free whitepaper – Server-gated cryptography

The cooling system inside Google’s Belgium data center has no chillers. It uses nothing but outside air – so-called “free-cooling” – to keep temperatures down. And if the Belgian air gets too hot, Google shifts the data center’s compute loads to other facilities.

As we reported late last month, Google senior manager of engineering and architecture Vijay Gill alluded to this chiller-less setup during a cloud-happy tech conference in San Francisco. And our piece sparked a follow-up story from our friends at Data Center Knowledge.

According to the site, Google openly discussed its chiller-free facility this spring during a data-center summit inside the Mountain View Chocolate Factory. The Belgium climate can provide free cooling for all but about seven days of the year, the company says, and during those hot summer days, Google offloads the facility’s tasks to other custom-built data centers, which now number about 36 worldwide.

The free-cooling idea is hardly unique – the likes of Microsoft and Yahoo! are also working to cut energy costs by using alternative cooling sources – but Google isn’t even using chillers as a fall-back.

Google tends to operate its data centers at over 80 degrees Fahrenheit – well above the norm – and according to one former employee, Intel provides the Chocolate Factory with chips that are better able to withstand heat than garden variety Chipzilla processors. But it’s unclear how Google’s free cooling setup operates. The company did not immediately respond to our request for comment.

Speaking at Structure 09, the wonderfully-witty Vijay Gill seemed to indicate that when there’s a temperature spike in the chiller-less data center, its top-secret infrastructure can respond without human intervention.

“You have to have integration with everything right from the chillers down all the way to the CPU,” he said. “Sometimes, there’s a temperature excursion, and you might want to do a quick load-shedding – a quick load-shedding to prevent a temperature excursion because, hey, you have a data center with no chillers. You want to move some load off. You want to cut some CPUs and some of the processes in RAM.”

And he hinted that Google can (almost) instantly shift loads from one data center to another as if moving data between servers. Google likes to think of each data center as one big machine. The Datacenter as a Computer: An Introduction to the Design of Warehouse-Scale Machines is the title of the now-famous paper.

“How do you manage the system and optimize it on a global level? That is the interesting part,” Gill continued. “What we’ve got here [with Google] is massive – like hundreds of thousands of variable linear programming problems that need to run in quasi-real-time. When the temperature starts to excurse in a data center, you don’t have the luxury to sitting around for a half an hour…You have on the order of seconds.”

But when asked if this technology is in place today, Gill responded in typical Google fashion. “I could not possibly comment on that,” he said. Likewise, when The Reg contacted Google today about its chiller-less setup, the company did not immediately respond.

In a March interview with Data Center Knowledge, however, Google senior vice president of operations Urs Holzle indicated that the company uses manual tools for load shifts between data centers. “Teams regularly practice failing out of or routing around specific data centers as part of scheduled maintenance,” he said. “Sometimes, we need to build new tools when new classes of problems happen.”

And if Google does have automated tools doing this sort of thing, you have to wonder how well they’re working. Earlier this year, two much-discussed Gmail outages involved Google shifting loads between data centers. ®

PuTERAKL says “Google, samalu kita salut!”


Five ways Microsoft has changed since Gates left

July 16, 2009

By Tim Ferguson silicon.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 09, 2009 7:23:23 AM

It’s been a year since Bill Gates left Microsoft in his official capacity. At the time many speculated his departure would spark a significant shift in Redmond.

 

But how much has really changed during Microsoft’s first year without Gates?

Here I chart the major trends in the company’s product strategy and leadership style since Gates’s departure.

See also: One year after Bill Gates’ ‘retirement’: What’s different?

Embracing the cloud
Under the leadership of chief software architect Ray Ozzie, Microsoft has been keen to get more involved with cloud computing. One of the company’s most intriguing new products in this area is cloud-based computing platform Windows Azure, which was announced in October 2008.

David Mitchell, analyst with Ovum, says Windows Azure represents a clear break from the Gates days.

He told silicon.com: “With the announcements around Azure that were made at PDC [Microsoft's Professional Developers Conference] last year, Microsoft has embraced the move towards cloud computing with considerable gusto. The extent of their investment in physical infrastructure is enormous but it is the evolution of their software product portfolio that is perhaps most ambitious.”

This evolution includes Microsoft’s “software plus services” model, which has seen many of its heavily used applications being hosted and distributed online. Mitchell suggested this is likely to accelerate in 2010 with the arrival of Office 14.

Quocirca analyst Bob Tarzey agrees that one of the biggest shifts for Microsoft in recent years is the adoption of software as a service. But he added this may not have been something that Gates would have held back on anyway as it’s a significant industry trend that Microsoft needed to address.

Ovum’s Mitchell, on the other hand, sees Microsoft’s greater acknowledgment of the web as proof of Ray Ozzie’s influence.

He said: “Ozzie has been instrumental in driving the company into the software plus services world, a trend that will accelerate in the next two years.”

More mature and thorough
Microsoft’s product strategy is certainly exhibiting more grown-up characteristics under Ozzie.

The company, according to Mitchell, is sporting a “more mature attitude” towards interoperability with products such as Open XML, ODF translators and support for the Daisy consortium, which is aimed at promoting talking documents for the visually impaired.

Microsoft is showing more care in managing its product portfolio. It halted investment in products that appear to be in terminal decline – such as Microsoft Money or security product OneCare, which is being replaced by Microsoft Security Essentials.

“In the past I don’t think that Microsoft was quite as thorough in the management of its portfolio, keeping investments going in some products, even when it was clear that they were not ‘economic over-achievers’,” Mitchell said.

New tune for Windows
A review of Microsoft’s past year would not be complete without a mention of its new desktop operating system, Windows 7, the successor of the poorly received Windows Vista received Windows Vista. Mitchell says the company has shown a new approach in developing Windows 7. He explained: “There has been a very conscious focus on gaining community support, embracing the developer and blogger influencers, and incrementally encouraging adoption.”

See also: Special Report: Windows 7 nears the finish line

The way Microsoft has distributed the beta of Windows 7 to a restricted audience, he explained, has meant that those included felt “special” while others felt they were missing out. Microsoft also communicated that it wanted feedback on the product, which it then acted on, showing a greater willingness to listen to users.

Mitchell said: “All this was designed to win the hearts and minds of influential communities – the analyst, blogger and developer communities. This approach to launch and adoption is in marked contrast to the Windows Vista launch.”

Leadership runs tight ship
Despite what some expected, Gates’ official departure wasn’t all that dramatic. CEO Steve Ballmer had been effectively running the company for some time and in the time just before Gates left, he hadn’t been hands-on with all decisions.

RedMonk analyst James Governor said: “The simple truth is that Microsoft has not changed as much as we might have expected since Bill Gates stepped down from day to day operations at Microsoft.”

“It’s important to remember that Ballmer has effectively been in charge for a long time already. I don’t think we’ll see really major changes in strategy from Microsoft until he moves on,” he added.

Bob Tarzey of Quocirca agreed that Steve Ballmer has been leading the business side of the company for several years but added leadership has been running a tight ship over the past year, including staff layoffs and spending cuts. “But these are credit crunch driven business decisions that Ballmer would have been involved with anyway,” he said.

Ovum’s Mitchell said Ballmer’s “greater commercial focus” has been noticeable, particularly in the economic downturn, although again this could well have been something that took place before Gates left.

Room for more change
Some believe the biggest trend for Microsoft since Gates left is that not enough has changed.

RedMonk’s Governor explained that Ozzie’s influence is yet to be fully felt. He said: “The Ozzie revolution has been somewhat quiet.”

Hopes that Gates’ departure would lead Microsoft to open up its software to the tech community have not been realised, Governor said. “While we’re seeing more and more open source business from Microsoft… this still seems more grassroots-led than top-down,” he explained.

Marketing too has stayed the same, he said, with big product launches still appearing to be the preferred way of doing things.

For example, last November’s PDC developer conference was all about cramming as much news as possible into a few days – a strategy which goes against the more open approach of having an ongoing dialogue with customers.

Over the last 12 months we’ve learned one thing: Though Microsoft’s products and leadership style are beginning to shift, the Bill Gates effect will probably never wear off completely.

His approach of developing existing technologies and delivering them to the mass market is large part of what made Microsoft the company it is today. Although new approaches will be pursued, it would be foolish to abandon Gates’ legacy altogether.

This article was originally published on silicon.com.


Manchester City’s Revolution

July 15, 2009

As per subject, it’s interesting to follow this so-called revolution from the beginning.. since wa pon takdak any EPL club wa follow thus far, I am thinking to opt to this MCFC.. Wa nak tengok dulu what’s their plan… in the beginning, surely they’ll be like Chelsea awal2 dulu… below are some of the interesting stories currently going on:-

1. Tevez joins City revolution

2. Adebayor set for City Terry bid next

PuTERAKL says “Revolusi.. Revolusi.. Revolusi!!”


Eminem – We Made You

July 10, 2009

Source

Guess Who… You Miss me?…
Jessica Simpson sing the chorus

When you walked through the door
It was clear to me (clear to me)
You’re the one they adore, who they came to see (who they came to see)
You’re a … rockstar (baby)
Everybody wants you (everybody wants you)
Player… Who can really blame you (who can really blame you)
We’re the ones who (chicka) made you *ahem*

Back by popular demand
Now pop a little zantac or ant’-acid if you can
You’re ready to tackle any task that is at hand
How does it feel, is it fantastic, is it grand?
Well look at all the massive masses in the stands
Shady man… no don’t massacre the fans
Damn, I think Kim Kardashians a man
She stumped just cause he asked to put his hands
On her massive glutious maximus again
Squeeze it, then Squish it, then pass it to her friend
Can he come back as nasty as he can
Yes he can,can, don’t ask me this again
He does not mean to lesbian offend
But Lindsay please come back to seeing men
Samantha’s a 2, Youre practically a 10
I know you want me girl,
In fact I see your grin – now come in girl

When you walked through the door
It was clear to me (clear to me)
You’re the one they adore, who they came to see (who they came to see)
You’re a … rockstar (baby)
Everybody wants you (everybody wants you)
Player… Who can really blame you (who can really blame you)
We’re the ones who made you

The enforcer, looking for more women to torture
Walk up to the cutest girl and Charlie Horse her
Sorry Portia, but whats Ellen Degeneres
Have that I don’t, are you telling me tenderness?
Well I can be as gentle and as smooth as a gentleman
Give me my ventolin inhaler and two Xenadrine
And I’ll invite Sarah Palin out to dinner then
Nail her, ‘Baby say hello to my little friend’
Brit f’orget K Fed lets cut off the middle man
Forget him or your gona end up in hospital again
And this time it wont be for the ritalin binge
Forget them other men, girl pay them little attention
A little bit did I mention
that Jennifer’s in love with me John Mayer
So sit on the bench
Man I swear them other guys you give em an inch
They take a mile, they got style but it isn’t Slim

When you walked through the door
It was clear to me (clear to me)
You’re the one they adore, who they came to see (who they came to see)
You’re a … rockstar (baby)
Everybody wants you (everybody wants you)
Player… Who can really blame you (who can really blame you)
Were the ones who made you

And that’s why… my love
You’ll never live without
I know you want me girl
cause I can see you checking me out
And baby, you know
you know you want me too
Don’t try to deny it baby
I’m the only one for you
(Fart)

Damn girl I’m beginning to sprout an Alfalfa
Why should I wash my filthy mouth out
You think that’s bad you should hear the rest of my album
Never has there been so finesse and nostalgia
Man Cash, I don’t mean to mess up your gal but
Jessica Alba put a breast in my mouth bro
Wowzers, I just made a mess of my trousers
And they wonder why I keep dressing like Elvis
Lord help us he’s back in his pink Alf shirt
Looking like someone shrinked his outfit
I think hes about to flip
Jessica
Rest assure, Supermans here to rescue ya
Can you blame me?
You’re my Amy, I’m your Blake
Matter fact make me a birthday cake
With a saw blade in it to make my jail break
Baby, I think you just met your soul mate
(Now break it down girl)

When you walked through the door
It was clear to me (clear to me)
You’re the one they adore, who they came to see (who they came to see)
You’re a … rockstar (baby)
Everybody wants you (everybody wants you)
Player… Who can really blame you (who can really blame you)
Were the ones who made you

So baby, baby
Get down, down, down

Baby, get down, down down
Baby, get down, down down
Baby, get down, get down

Baby, get down, down down
Baby, get down, down down
Baby, get down, down down
Baby, get down, get down

Oh Amy, Rehab never looked so good,
I can’t wait, Im going back!! HAHA Whooo!

DR DRE, 2020, Yeah

PuTERAKL says “Cool ;) .. as usual… Eminem with his kata-kata yang pedas


‘Evil’ swindler Madoff jailed for 150 years

June 30, 2009

by AFP

Wall Street swindler Bernard Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in jail for masterminding an “evil” multi-billion-dollar investment scam that cheated thousands of people around the world.

“It is the judgment of this court that Bernard Madoff should be sentenced to 150 years in jail,” Judge Denny Chin said as he handed down the maximum term possible on 11 charges of fraud, theft and perjury.

He described Madoff’s crimes as “extraordinarily evil” and said it was “not merely a bloodless crime that takes place on paper but one that takes a staggering human toll.”

The tough sentence came even after Madoff, the former chairman of the Nasdaq, made a courtroom apology to his victims. “I am sorry,” he told them simply. “I don’t ask for forgiveness.”

“I leave a legacy of shame to my family. I am responsible for a great deal of suffering and pain. I live in a tormented state,” said the disgraced 71-year-old financier who now faces spending the rest of his life in prison.

“I cannot offer an excuse for my behavior,” he added. “How do you excuse deceiving investors… and 200 employees?

“How do you excuse lying to my sons and two brothers? How do you excuse lying to a wife who stood by you for 50 years and still stands by me? There is no excuse for that.”

Some of Madoff’s victims vented their fury as they addressed the court.

Cheryl Weinstein blasted Madoff as “a monster.”

“He walks among us. But he is a beast who has fed upon us to satisfy his own needs… I am asking you to keep (him) in a cage behind bars,” she said.

Bursting into tears, Burt Ross, who lost five million dollars, said Madoff “has truly earned his reputation of being the most despised person in America today.”

“I only hope that his jail sentence is long enough so that his jail cell becomes his coffin,” said Michael Schwartz, 33, explaining that the money stolen from his family had been set aside to take care of his mentally disabled brother.

Judge Chin gave Madoff 10 days to appeal, but noted there had not been a single letter from friends or family testifying to his good deeds. “The absence of such support is telling,” he said.

Madoff’s wife, Ruth, finally broke her silence Monday to lash out at her husband, saying: “All those touched by this fraud feel betrayed; disbelieving the nightmare they woke to.

“The man who committed this horrible fraud is not the man whom I have known all these years,” she said in a statement.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs weighed in later by saying the maximum sentence handed to Madoff would send an effective warning to other investors.

“The judge wanted to send a very strong signal to anybody that invests money on behalf of others of the amazing responsibility that they have to those investors and to the country,” he said, adding “that message will be heard loud and clear.”

The former Wall Street icon can expect to face high security in jail rather than a more lax “prison camp” that other white-collar criminals might receive, according to former federal prosecutor William Devaney.

The decision, Devaney told AFP, is not for the judge but the court can make recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons.

The verdict came some six months after the biting economic downturn forced Madoff to unmask himself as behind one of the biggest financial scams in history.

Prosecutors say about 13 billion dollars was handed to Madoff. The financier himself has talked about losing some 50 billion dollars, which is believed to be the amount that would have been paid out had the funds been properly invested.

“There are only two places that the cash could have gone upon leaving the fund,” Roger Siefert, who conducts investigations for financial advisor LECG, told AFP.

“Into the pockets of the Madoff family for personal use or to run the business… or to repay early investors,” he said, stressing that “significant amounts of it should be traceable, given enough time and energy.”

Among Madoff’s victims were Hollywood and international celebrities, several of the world’s best-known banks and Jewish charities, some of which were forced to close after the scheme unraveled.

Madoff told the court in March that of the billions of dollars that passed through his hands during the three-decade scam, he never invested one cent in the market. Instead he stashed the funds in a Chase Manhattan bank account.

The funds were then used to pay out “dividends” to investors in what is known as a “Ponzi scheme.”

One lingering issue is how to return the stolen funds. Of the billions of dollars that were lost, prosecutors say only one billion has been recovered.


Linkin Park: New Divide

June 27, 2009

Source

I remembered black skies
the lightning all around me
I remembered each flash
as time began to blur
Like a startling sign
that fate had finally found me

And your voice was all I heard
That I get what I deserve

So give me reason
to prove me wrong
to wash this memory clean
Let the floods cross
the distance in your eyes

Give me reason
to fill this hole
connect the space between
Let it be enough to reach the truth that lies
Across this new divide

There was nothing in sight
but memories left abandoned
There was nowhere to hide
the ashes fell like snow
And the ground caved in
between where we were standing

And your voice was all I heard
That I get what I deserve

So give me reason
to prove me wrong
to wash this memory clean
Let the floods cross the distance in your eyes
Across this new divide

In every loss
in every lie
In every truth that you’d deny
And each regret
and each goodbye
was a mistake to great to hide

And your voice was all I heard
That I get what I deserve

So give me reason
to prove me wrong
to wash this memory clean
Let the floods cross the distance in your eyes

Give me reason
to fill this hole
connect the space between
Let it be enough to reach the truth that lies
Across this new divide

Across this new divide
Across this new divide

PuTERAKL says “Cool!” ;)


Jackson may be ‘worth more dead than alive’

June 27, 2009

by AP

By RYAN NAKASHIMA and MICHAEL LIEDTKE, AP Business Writers Ryan Nakashima And Michael Liedtke, Ap Business Writers 1 hr 8 mins ago

LOS ANGELES – Michael Jackson spent the last years of his life buried in debt. But the King of Pop’s death is likely to yield a financial bonanza more lucrative than any comeback tour ever could, as fans snap up his music and memorabilia and perhaps one day get the chance to tour his Neverland home.

“Quite frankly, he may be worth more dead than alive,” said Jerry Reisman, general counsel for the Hit Factory, a recording studio where Jackson produced his best-selling album “Thriller.”

Jackson’s death at age 50 leaves a multitude of questions about a financial empire that included his own music, as well a 50 percent stake in a library that held the rights to songs by the Beatles. But Jackson reportedly had $400 million in debts, and it isn’t known yet how his estate will be divided and who the beneficiaries will be.

This much is clear: Jackson’s heirs, music labels and opportunists will probably be mining his legacy for decades to come.

In that way, his death may parallel that of the music industry’s original King — Elvis Presley, who died in 1977 at age 42.

Like Jackson, Presley hadn’t had a hit album in years. At the end of his life, he was mostly relying on royalties from his past hits and doing shows in Las Vegas. But in death he became a moneymaking phenomenon.

Presley’s estate was valued at just $4.9 million at the time of his death. In 2005, a company run by media entrepreneur Robert F.X. Sillerman paid $100 million for 85 percent of the estate and a 90-year lease on his Memphis mansion, Graceland.

By some estimates, Jackson’s estate could be worth more than $1 billion. Besides the master recordings of his own music, Jackson owned half of Sony/ATV Music Publishing, a jewel estimated to be worth $2 billion by itself. The 750,000-song catalog includes music by the Beatles, Bob Dylan, Neil Diamond, Lady Gaga and the Jonas Brothers.

Creditors will get first crack at the estate.

“I think the first question is, `Is there anything left after you pay off the debts?’” said Robert Rasmussen, the dean of law at the University of Southern California.

Jackson might have shielded some of his estate from creditors and ensured that his children were taken care of by placing a life insurance policy and other assets in an irrevocable trust, said Steve Hartnett, associate director of education for the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

The pop star left behind three children: Michael Joseph Jackson Jr., known as Prince Michael, 12; Paris Michael Katherine Jackson, 11; and Prince Michael II, 7. The elder children were born to ex-wife Deborah Rowe, while the youngest is his biological son, born to a surrogate mother.

Other potential beneficiaries include Jackson’s parents, his five brothers, three sisters and a long list of nieces and nephews. His children’s nanny was believed to be close to Jackson.

The contents of Jackson’s will have not been released. Typically, a will becomes public within about 30 days of a person’s death.

In a statement Friday, Joel Katz, Jackson’s entertainment affairs attorney, gave no clues to how Jackson disposed of his estate.

“Michael Jackson was a perfectionist, and his business affairs are worldwide,” Katz said. “Many of them are quite ongoing and will be dealt with appropriately.”

One big question will be what happens to Neverland, where Jackson surrounded himself with animals, rides and children. Jackson nearly lost the ranch to foreclosure in March, but billionaire real estate investor Thomas Barrack bailed him out, setting up a joint venture with Jackson that took ownership of the 2,500-acre (1,000-hectare) property in Santa Barbara County.

Barrack declined to comment.

Fans, meanwhile, are rushing to buy Jackson’s old songs in a scramble that began within minutes of his death. Both Amazon and Barnes and Noble reported selling out of Jackson’s CDs, and his music accounted for the most downloads at Apple’s iTunes store.

Amazon’s sales of Jackson’s albums and MP3s were 700 times higher on Thursday after news of Jackson’s death, and they were running at an even higher rate Friday, according to Bill Carr, the company’s vice president of music and video.

“It’s really hard to express what someone dying really means and how it absolutely brands that individual into the culture,” said Del Bryant, CEO of Broadcast Music Inc., which collects royalties for the use of “Beat It,” “Billy Jean” and other songs composed by Jackson. “If you look at everyone from Patsy Cline to the Big Bopper to Buddy Holly … the effect on the catalog is tremendous.”

Bryant said expects revenue from public performances of Jackson’s songs to triple this year because of his death.

Sillerman’s company, CKX, controls licensing of Presley’s image, which has been slapped on dozens of pieces of merchandise, such as T-shirts, watches, belt buckles and figurines. In 2007, Presley’s brand earned $52 million — beating out living acts like Justin Timberlake and Madonna, according to Forbes magazine, which has put Elvis atop its list of top-earning dead celebrities for two years running.

Jackson’s heirs may similarly explore ways to make money from the singer’s likeness and art, perhaps through T-shirts, compilations of previously unreleased music, or stage productions based on his songs.

It’s also easy to envision Neverland becoming the next Graceland, said Steve Gordon, an entertainment attorney who worked at Sony Music during the 1990s.

The singer’s death could also boost business for the legion of Jackson impersonators. Adrienne Gusoff, who runs the New York-based impersonating agency Bubbygram.com, said she expects the dozen Jackson clones she represents to be about as much in demand as entertainers who impersonate stars like Frank Sinatra and Marilyn Monroe.

“I think his death will make him an even bigger star,” Gusoff said.

First, though, her Jackson impersonators will have to get over the loss of their hero. “One of my guys in New Jersey is devastated,” she said. “It’s like a family member died.’

___

Michael Liedtke reported from San Francisco. AP Business Writers Alex Veiga in Los Angeles, Stevenson Jacobs in New York, Rachel Metz in New York and Jessica Mintz in Seattle contributed to this story.